Monday, February 12, 2018

Ethisphere: Dell, Microsoft, and Salesforce are among the world’s most ethical companies

Something every woman should know - WHY MEN LIE!


Ethisphere released its 2018 list of the most ethical companies in the world today, which include Microsoft, LinkedIn, Salesforce, Intel, and Dell. The New York City-based institute named 135 companies in total, spanning 23 countries and 57 industries.

The assessment is based on Ethisphere’s Ethics Quotient (EQ), which factors in five categories: ethics and compliance program; corporate citizenship and responsibility; culture of ethics; governance; and leadership, innovation, and reputation.

“Once again, financial metrics support this strategy as the 2018 world’s most ethical companies have proven that operating with integrity leads to greater financial performance,” wrote Ethisphere CEO Timothy Erblich, in a letter.

2017 was a rocky year for many power capitals in the U.S., especially Silicon Valley. With sexual harassment allegations swarming through the tech community and reports of companies not being diverse or inclusive enough, founders and investors are gradually putting new initiatives into place to do better.

“Research from McKinsey tells us companies with more diverse workforces outperform their peers,” added Erblich. “Edelman’s Trust barometer shows employees increasingly look to their companies for societal leadership. Responsible investing continued its meteoric rise. In fact, just this month Blackrock called for the CEOs of global companies to put purpose at the forefront of their long-term vision.”

It’s important to point out that the majority of the companies recognized by Ethisphere are large, corporate, public companies that have had time to implement ethical and sustainable frameworks within their businesses. This, however, should be a cautionary tale for early-stage startups that may want to avoid the public scrutiny and backlash some tech unicorns (*cough* Uber) are now facing due to their ingrained toxic work cultures.

Reverse Phone - People Search - Email Search - Public Records - Criminal Records. Best Data, Conversions, And Customer Suppor

Friday, February 9, 2018

Diagnosing Why a Site's Set of Pages May Be Ranking Poorly - Whiteboard Friday

Something every woman should know - WHY MEN LIE!

Posted by randfish

Your rankings have dropped and you don't know why. Maybe your traffic dropped as well, or maybe just a section of your site has lost rankings. It's an important and often complex mystery to solve, and there are a number of boxes to check off while you investigate. In this Whiteboard Friday, Rand shares a detailed process to follow to diagnose what went wrong to cause your rankings drop, why it happened, and how to start the recovery process.

Diagnosing why a site's pages may be ranking poorly

Click on the whiteboard image above to open a high-resolution version in a new tab!

Video Transcription

Howdy, Moz fans, and welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday. This week we're going to talk about diagnosing a site and specifically a section of a site's pages and why they might be performing poorly, why their traffic may have dropped, why rankings may have dropped, why both of them might have dropped. So we've got a fairly extensive process here, so let's get started.

Step 1: Uncover the problem

First off, our first step is uncovering the problem or finding whether there is actually a problem. A good way to think about this is especially if you have a larger website, if we're talking about a site that's 20 or 30 or even a couple hundred pages, this is not a big issue. But many websites that SEOs are working on these days are thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of pages. So what I like to urge folks to do is to

A. Treat different site sections as unique segments for investigation. You should look at them individually.

A lot of times subfolders or URL structures are really helpful here. So I might say, okay, MySite.com, I'm going to look exclusively at the /news section. Did that fall in rankings? Did it fall in traffic? Or was it /posts, where my blog posts and my content is? Or was it /cities? Let's say I have a website that's dealing with data about the population of cities. So I rank for lots of those types of queries, and it seems like I'm ranking for fewer of them, and it's my cities pages that are poorly performing in comparison to where they were a few months ago or last year at this time.

B. Check traffic from search over time.

So I go to my Google Analytics or whatever analytics you're using, and you might see something like, okay, I'm going to look exclusively at the /cities section. If you can structure your URLs in this fashion, use subfolders, this is a great way to do it. Then take a look and see, oh, hang on, that's a big traffic drop. We fell off a cliff there for these particular pages.

This data can be hiding inside your analytics because it could be that the rest of your site is performing well. It's going sort of up and to the right, and so you see this slow plateauing or a little bit of a decline, but it's not nearly as sharp as it is if you look at the traffic specifically for a single subsection that might be performing poorly, like this /cities section.

From there, I'm going to next urge you to use Google Trends. Why? Why would I go to Google Trends? Because what I want you to do is I want you to look at some of your big keywords and topics in Google Trends to see if there has been a serious decline in search volume at the same time. If search demand is rising or staying stable over the course of time where you have lost traffic, it's almost certainly something you've done, not something searchers are doing. But if you see that traffic has declined, for example, maybe you were ranking really well for population data from 2015. It turns out people are now looking for population data for 2016 or '17 or '18. Maybe that is part of the problem, that search demand has fallen and your curve matches that.

C. Perform some diagnostic queries or use your rank tracking data if you have it on these types of things.

This is one of the reasons I like to rank track for even these types of queries that don't get a lot of traffic.

1. Target keywords. In this case, it might be "Denver population growth," maybe that's one of your keywords. You would see, "Do I still rank for this? How well do I rank for this? Am I ranking more poorly than I used to?"

2. Check brand name plus target keyword. So, in this case, it would be my site plus the above here plus "Denver population growth," so My Site or MySite.com Denver population growth. If you're not ranking for that, that's usually an indication of a more serious problem, potentially a penalty or some type of dampening that's happening around your brand name or around your website.

3. Look for a 10 to 20-word text string from page content without quotes. It could be shorter. It could be only six or seven words, or it could be longer, 25 words if you really need it. But essentially, I want to take a string of text that exists on the page and put it in order in Google search engine, not in quotes. I do not want to use quotes here, and I want to see how it performs. This might be several lines of text here.

4. Look for a 10 to 20-word text string with quotes. So those lines of text, but in quotes searched in Google. If I'm not ranking for this, but I am for this one ... sorry, if I'm not ranking for the one not in quotes, but I am in quotes, I might surmise this is probably not duplicate content. It's probably something to do with my content quality or maybe my link profile or Google has penalized or dampened me in some way.

5. site: urlstring/ So I would search for "site:MySite.com/cities/Denver." I would see: Wait, has Google actually indexed my page? When did they index it? Oh, it's been a month. I wonder why they haven't come back. Maybe there's some sort of crawl issue, robots.txt issue, meta robots issue, something. I'm preventing Google from potentially getting there. Or maybe they can't get there at all, and this results in zero results. That means Google hasn't even indexed the page. Now we have another type of problem.

D. Check your tools.

1. Google Search Console. I would start there, especially in the site issues section.

2. Check your rank tracker or whatever tool you're using, whether that's Moz or something else.

3. On-page and crawl monitoring. Hopefully you have something like that. It could be through Screaming Frog. Maybe you've run some crawls over time, or maybe you have a tracking system in place. Moz has a crawl system. OnPage.org has a really good one.

4. Site uptime. So I might check Pingdom or other things that alert me to, "Oh, wait a minute, my site was down for a few days last week. That obviously is why traffic has fallen," those types of things.

Step 2: Offer hypothesis for falling rankings/traffic

Okay, you've done your diagnostics. Now it's time to offer some hypotheses. So now that we understand which problem I might have, I want to understand what could be resulting in that problem. So there are basically two situations you can have. Rankings have stayed stable or gone up, but traffic has fallen.

A. If rankings are up, but traffic is down...

In those cases, these are the five things that are most typically to blame.

1. New SERP features. There's a bunch of featured snippets that have entered the population growth for cities search results, and so now number one is not what number one used to be. If you don't get that featured snippet, you're losing out to one of your competitors.

2. Lower search demand. Like we talked about in Google Trends. I'm looking at search demand, and there are just not as many people searching as there used to be.

3. Brand or reputation issues. I'm ranking just fine, but people now for some reason hate me. People who are searching this sector think my brand is evil or bad or just not as helpful as it used to be. So I have issues, and people are not clicking on my results. They're choosing someone else actively because of reputation issues.

4. Snippet problems. I'm ranking in the same place I used to be, but I'm no longer the sexiest, most click-drawing snippet in the search results, and other people are earning those clicks instead.

5. Shift in personalization or location biasing by Google. It used to be the case that everyone who searched for city name plus population growth got the same results, but now suddenly people are seeing different results based on maybe their device or things they've clicked in the past or where they're located. Location is often a big cause for this.

So for many SEOs for many years, "SEO consultant" resulted in the same search results. Then Google introduced the Maps results and pushed down a lot of those folks, and now "SEO consultant" results in different ranked results in each city and each geography that you search in. So that can often be a cause for falling traffic even though rankings remain high.

B. If rankings and traffic are down...

If you're seeing that rankings have fallen and traffic has fallen in conjunction, there's a bunch of other things that are probably going on that are not necessarily these things. A few of these could be responsible still, like snippet problems could cause your rankings and your traffic to fall, or brand and reputation issues could cause your click-through rate to fall, which would cause you to get dampened. But oftentimes it's things like this:

1. & 2. Duplicate content and low-quality or thin content. Google thinks that what you're providing just isn't good enough.

3. Change in searcher intent. People who were searching for population growth used to want what you had to offer, but now they want something different and other people in the SERP are providing that, but you are not, so Google is ranking you lower. Even though your content is still good, it's just not serving the new searcher intent.

4. Loss to competitors. So maybe you have worse links than they do now or less relevance or you're not solving the searcher's query as well. Your user interface, your UX is not as good. Your keyword targeting isn't as good as theirs. Your content quality and the unique value you provide isn't as good as theirs. If you see that one or two competitors are consistently outranking you, you might diagnose that this is the problem.

5. Technical issues. So if I saw from over here that the crawl was the problem, I wasn't getting indexed, or Google hasn't updated my pages in a long time, I might look into accessibility things, maybe speed, maybe I'm having problems like letting Googlebot in, HTTPS problems, or indexable content, maybe Google can't see the content on my page anymore because I made some change in the technology of how it's displayed, or crawlability, internal link structure problems, robots.txt problems, meta robots tag issues, that kind of stuff.

Maybe at the server level, someone on the tech ops team of my website decided, "Oh, there's this really problematic bot coming from Mountain View that's costing us a bunch of bandwidth. Let's block bots from Mountain View." No, don't do that. Bad. Those kinds of technical issues can happen.

6. Spam and penalties. We'll talk a little bit more about how to diagnose those in a second.

7. CTR, engagement, or pogo-sticking issues. There could be click-through rate issues or engagement issues, meaning pogo sticking, like people are coming to your site, but they are clicking back because they weren't satisfied by your results, maybe because their expectations have changed or market issues have changed.

Step 3: Make fixes and observe results

All right. Next and last in this process, what we're going to do is make some fixes and observe the results. Hopefully, we've been able to correctly diagnose and form some wise hypotheses about what's going wrong, and now we're going to try and resolve them.

A. On-page and technical issues should solve after a new crawl + index.

So on-page and technical issues, if we're fixing those, they should usually resolve, especially on small sections of sites, pretty fast. As soon as Google has crawled and indexed the page, you should generally see performance improve. But this can take a few weeks if we're talking about a large section on a site, many thousands of pages, because Google has to crawl and index all of them to get the new sense that things are fixed and traffic is coming in. Since it's long tail to many different pages, you're not going to see that instant traffic gain and rise as fast.

B. Link issues and spam penalty problems can take months to show results.

Look, if you have crappier links or not a good enough link profile as your competitors, growing that can take months or years even to fix. Penalty problems and spam problems, same thing. Google can take sometimes a long time. You've seen a lot of spam experts on Twitter saying, "Oh, well, all my clients who had issues over the last nine months suddenly are ranking better today," because Google made some fix in their latest index rollout or their algorithm changed, and it's sort of, okay, well we'll reward the people for all the fixes that they've made. Sometimes that's in batches that take months.

C. Fixing a small number of pages in a section that's performing poorly might not show results very quickly.

For example, let's say you go and you fix /cities/Milwaukee. You determine from your diagnostics that the problem is a content quality issue. So you go and you update these pages. They have new content. It serves the searchers much better, doing a much better job. You've tested it. People really love it. You fixed two cities, Milwaukee and Denver, to test it out. But you've left 5,000 other cities pages untouched.

Sometimes Google will sort of be like, "No, you know what? We still think your cities pages, as a whole, don't do a good job solving this query. So even though these two that you've updated do a better job, we're not necessarily going to rank them, because we sort of think of your site as this whole section and we grade it as a section or apply some grades as a section." That is a real thing that we've observed happening in Google's results.

Because of this, one of the things that I would urge you to do is if you're seeing good results from the people you're testing it with and you're pretty confident, I would roll out the changes to a significant subset, 30%, 50%, 70% of the pages rather than doing only a tiny, tiny sample.

D. Sometimes when you encounter these issues, a remove and replace strategy works better than simply upgrading old URLs.

So if Google has decided /cities, your /cities section is just awful, has all sorts of problems, not performing well on a bunch of different vectors, you might take your /cities section and actually 301 redirect them to a new URL, /location, and put the new UI and the new content that better serves the searcher and fixes a lot of these issues into that location section, such that Google now goes, "Ah, we have something new to judge. Let's see how these location pages on MySite.com perform versus the old cities pages."

So I know we've covered a ton today and there are a lot of diagnostic issues that we haven't necessarily dug deep into, but I hope this can help you if you're encountering rankings challenges with sections of your site or with your site as a whole. Certainly, I look forward to your comments and your feedback. If you have other tips for folks facing this, that would be great. We'll see you again next week for another edition of Whiteboard Friday. Take care.

Video transcription by Speechpad.com


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

Reverse Phone - People Search - Email Search - Public Records - Criminal Records. Best Data, Conversions, And Customer Suppor

Wednesday, February 7, 2018

Dfinity raises $61 million for blockchain-based cloud

Something every woman should know - WHY MEN LIE!


The Dfinity blockchain project has big aspirations for the $61 million it raised from Polychain Capital and Andreessen Horowitz today. The company wants to create a new, decentralized cloud — a “cloud 3.0” — that will cut the costs of running cloud-based business applications by 90 percent and upend the current cloud services model led by Amazon and Google.

The backing of respected VC firms, a sharp team, and the promise of a new type of blockchain able to move fast, all indicate this is a project worth watching. But it can be hard to nail down exactly what Dfinity’s mission is. In an interview with VentureBeat, team leader Dominic Williams talked about everything from enabling a new internet populated with open, decentralized versions of popular services like eBay, Dropbox, and Uber to enabling consumers to heat their houses with the specialized, server-grade hardware they’ll be able to use to mine Dfinity coins.

The project’s true selling point, though, seems to be that it would give enterprises access to what Williams calls an “internet computer” — a single, infinitely scaleable, internet-based computer. A business that today hosts applications and processes on, say, Amazon Web Services has to rent multiple computer instances, each of which need to be configured and maintained, Williams explained, whereas, once the Dfinity network is available, businesses will be able to run all of their systems in one place:

The Dfinity network … produces a single ‘Internet Computer’ with unbounded capacity. You do not need to manage … individual computer instances yourself, nor need to worry about copying data into a database in case one of your computer instances gets restarted or crashes. Instead you let the Internet Computer take care of everything for you … [It] is unstoppable and also helps with requirements like data privacy. Because business systems co-host on the same enormous virtual computer, interoperation, where desirable, is much easier.

This reinvention of cloud-based computing should cut an organization’s cloud costs by 90 percent, according to the team. But those cost savings would apparently be related to human layoffs rather than lower computing costs. As Williams explained in a blog post last year, “computation on blockchain computers is far more expensive than on traditional clouds such as Amazon Web Services. But dramatic savings are possible because the vast majority of costs involved in running enterprise IT systems derive from supporting human capital, not computation per se, and the Dfinity cloud will make it possible to create systems that involve far less human capital.”

The Dfinity network isn’t expected to deploy until the end of 2018; however, a small (500 node) testnet deployed in October apparently showed strong results. The globally distributed testnet was able to finalize computations in one second, compared to 600 seconds needed by the Ethereum blockchain and 3,600 seconds needed by Bitcoin, the team said.

There are clearly key missing pieces that need to materialize before businesses can move to the Dfinity model. First, a large, geographically distributed Dfinity mining community will need to emerge to create the underlying decentralized network.

Dfinity is currently in talks with private hosting centers in the hopes of converting them to Dfinity. These are businesses, Williams said, that are finding it hard to compete with AWS but could turn their free racks into Dfinity mining rigs. The team is also talking to hardware manufacturers about producing the specialized servers needed to mine Dfinity (running a machine with less capacity than needed results in a penalty, Williams explained, and there is no reward for excess capacity, hence the need for equipment tailored to Dfinity’s specifications). Finally, Williams said, the team may choose to fund about 20 data centers itself on shipping containers and deploy them around the world to kickstart the network (although it’s unclear how such a move would serve the goal of decentralization).

A second critical piece of the puzzle will be business software that can run on the new network. Companies will need Dfinity-native versions of the tools and applications they rely on. To that end, Dfinity and Polychain Capital announced today that they will be co-managing a Dfinity Ecosystem Venture Fund to support third-party teams that want to build applications, tools, and protocols for Dfinity.

Williams is unabashedly optimistic about the process of building out this ecosystem. “It will be extraordinarily easy to build on Dfinity,” he said. “Developers building on the Internet Computer will have super powers. The word will get around that these guys are building with all these amazing benefits. And uptake will be pretty rapid once the word gets out.”

Dfinity is registered as a non-profit foundation in Zug, Switzerland but has research centers in Palo Alto, California, and Germany. The fundraise announced today is considered a contribution to the work of the foundation, and in return, “the foundation promises to recommend [the contributors] an allocation of tokens” when the network goes live, Williams said.

The Dfinity team ran a public “seed stage” ICO last February and expected to follow that up with a “main” ICO late last year. But the new capital infusion announced today may have taken the place of that public ICO.

“We are wary of running an ICO and having our reputations tarnished by some of the ‘bad’ ICOs that were run, or becoming embroiled with problems with regulators,” Williams said. Given the level of community interest to participate in the project, though (Williams references “hundreds of millions” of people), he said the team is looking at other options for a token distribution.

Reverse Phone - People Search - Email Search - Public Records - Criminal Records. Best Data, Conversions, And Customer Suppor

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

Beautiful.ai helps non-designers create more polished presentations

Something every woman should know - WHY MEN LIE!


Despite many upstarts seeking to make their mark on presentations over the years, Microsoft’s PowerPoint remains the number one presentation player globally, with an estimated 95 percent market share.

Given Microsoft’s ubiquity in the business realm, it can be difficult for companies to shift entirely to new presentation tools, even if they are willing. However, there is nothing stopping them from using different programs for different situations.

Against that backdrop, San Francisco-based Beautiful.ai, which pitches itself as “the first AI-powered presentation design tool,” is launching out of beta today.

Looking good

Though PowerPoint has evolved over the past three decades, the underlying concept remains the same: The end user creates the content and is responsible for the layout and general look and feel. There are built-in tools to remove some of the manual labor, but for the most part the user is in charge of the design, even if they have no real design credentials. And this is where Beautiful.ai is hoping to find its niche.

The company was founded in 2015 by Mitch Grasso, who helped found another presentation startup called SlideRocket, which was acquired by VMware back in 2011. Clearly, Grasso thinks presentation programs are ripe for improvement, something he’s setting out to do with his latest startup that promises to “apply the rules of good design in real time.”

Browser-based Beautiful.ai features around 50 customizable “smart” templates that adapt and adjust as you fine-tune your content. Basically, you don’t have to worry about changing fonts or tweaking text boxes — Beautiful.ai promises to take care of everything.

Above: Beautiful.ai

By way of example, if you decide to change the background color of your slide from light to dark, you would normally have to change the text color so that it doesn’t blend in with the background. But Beautiful.ai automatically changes the text color to contrast with the backdrop.

Above: Beautiful.ai

“We’ve all experienced those moments — tinkering with text boxes at 2 a.m., drawing boxes and circles and then trying to align them, or spending hours looking for the right image for our slide,” noted Grasso. “We’re using AI to give users the benefits of professional-quality design without the pain of spending hours, or even days, perfecting their presentations.”

Based on our brief tests, Beautiful.ai works well, though unfortunately the web app only seems to be compatible with Google Chrome for now. There is no word as of yet when it may expand to other browsers or platforms.

The state of play

Other notable “PowerPoint-killers” already on the market include heavily funded Hungarian startup Prezi, which has built a solid reputation over the past decade for its slick platform that uses a “zoomable” canvas on which you can plot all the different components of a presentation.

Elsewhere, Seattle-based Haiku Deck launched an AI-powered presentation tool a few years back called Zuru, however, that one requires you to upload an existing presentation file from PowerPoint or a draft outline, which it then transforms into something much prettier.

Beautiful.ai raised a $5.3 million series A round back in 2016 from First Round Capital and Shasta Ventures. The software is now available for everyone to use for free until June, 2018, after which the company will introduce tiered pricing for individuals and companies.

Reverse Phone - People Search - Email Search - Public Records - Criminal Records. Best Data, Conversions, And Customer Suppor

Friday, February 2, 2018

Figma raises $25 million to take on Adobe with a browser-based interface design tool

Something every woman should know - WHY MEN LIE!


Figma, an interface design and prototyping tool that works in the browser, has raised $25 million in a series B round of funding from Kleiner Perkins, Greylock, and Index Ventures.

Founded out of San Francisco in 2012, Figma is one of a number of players plying their trades in the UI design and prototyping realm. However, Figma claims a number of notable advantages.

For example, Figma works in the browser and facilitates collaboration between team members who are working on the same app or website design. Moreover, you don’t have to upload or download files, this is all in real time, with all edits made visible to collaborators instantly and a messaging facility available for discussion. In short, it’s kind of like Google Docs for designing, prototyping, and collaborating around the interface creation process.

Above: Figma: Discussing mobile app design project

Much like other UI design tools, Figma also offers accompanying “mirror” apps for smartphones so you can see what an app design looks like on a real device. And it also offers desktop apps that bring some offline functionality to the mix.

Figma launched in preview back in 2015, though it didn’t launch fully to the public until the following year. Prior to now, the company had raised around $18 million in funding from such notable names as Greylock, Index, LinkedIn CEO Jeff Weiner, and computer scientist DJ Patil. And with another $25 million in the bank, the company said it plans to double down on its efforts in the enterprise.

Competitors in the space includes the mighty Adobe, which launched its Adobe XD prototyping and wireframing tool in October after 18 months in beta, though it still only works on macOS 10.11/Windows 10 Anniversary and later. Adobe XD is still in its relative infancy, but given the company’s existing footprint and reputation in the design realm, it will clearly be a major competitor to the likes of Figma. Elsewhere, New York-based InVision offers similar UI prototyping smarts, though you have to create the mockups and wireframes using a separate design tool, while Dutch startup Bohemian Coding offers the popular Mac-only app Sketch.

Clearly, there is a big demand in the designer world for such tools, as InVision raised $100 million a few months back, taking its total funding to more than $230 million since its inception in 2011. Shortly after, Netherlands-based Framer secured $7.7 million for its visual design prototyping tool.

Figma claims some big-name customers, including Microsoft, Uber, and Slack. Indeed, Kleiner Perkins, which led on Figma’s latest funding round, is also one of Slack’s backers. Mamoon Hamid, general partner at Kleiner Perkins, sees some similarities between the two companies.

“Figma makes the design process more open and collaborative so teams can develop and bring new products to market faster,” said Hamid. “In many respects, Figma’s traction and potential remind me of Slack at this stage.”

Figma represents Hamid’s inaugural investment since he joined Kleiner Perkins back in August.

Sign up for Funding Daily: Get the latest news in your inbox every weekday.

Reverse Phone - People Search - Email Search - Public Records - Criminal Records. Best Data, Conversions, And Customer Suppor

Thursday, February 1, 2018

Heartland Tech Weekly: Affordable education is the key to preparing for job displacement

Something every woman should know - WHY MEN LIE!


This week, MSNBC and Recode hosted a town hall with Google’s Sundar Pichai and YouTube’s Susan Wojcicki to get their thoughts on how technology is affecting the U.S. and what responsibility big tech has in ensuring that all Americans get to reap the benefits of innovation.

The town hall touched on a number of buzzy topics right now, including immigration, the role platforms like Google and Facebook may have played in the 2016 presidential election, and diversity in tech. The portion that piqued my interest was when Recode’s Kara Swisher and MSNBC’s Ari Melber asked Pichai and Wojcicki about how artificial intelligence will change the way America approaches job training.


VentureBeat’s Heartland Tech channel invites you to join us and other senior business leaders at BLUEPRINT in Reno on March 5-7. Learn how to expand jobs to Middle America, lower costs, and boost profits. Click here to request an invite and be a part of the conversation. 


Artificial intelligence has the potential to automate a continuous onslaught of white collar skills — from accounting to radiology — and Swisher wanted to know what Google is doing to help prepare American workers for a future where the job they went to college for may one day be automated.

“Twenty, thirty years ago — you educated yourself, and that carried you through for the rest of your life. That’s not going to be true for the generation which is being born now. They have to learn continuously over their lives — we know that, so we have to transform how we do education,” Pichai said.

“You need to move forward with that technology responsibly — that means partnerships between government and private companies to be able to make sure that … whichever group whose job ends up changing has that support system to be able to retrain to be able to find what that next set of jobs are,” Wojcicki added.

I think that this is a correct assumption, but I don’t think that the public and private sector is tackling the issue of affordable education with the urgency it needs to, if there will indeed be a future where American workers are going to have to train for multiple jobs over the course of their lifetime.

Tech companies are addressing this issue, but there are potential pitfalls that could arise with their models. Google teamed up with Coursera a couple of weeks ago to launch a low-cost online program to train entry-level IT professionals — but it remains to be seen if this is a model that can work across multiple professions, and if similar programs can be created without being subsidized by Google. And a new startup I wrote about yesterday called Lambda School wants to make software engineering education more affordable through the use of income-share agreements — but this model may still be too costly for people who have existing debt.

I’ve included the link to the full Recode/MSNBC town hall as today’s featured video. The discussion on job training begins at roughly the 33 minute mark.

As always, please send news tips or feedback to me via email, and be sure to bookmark our Heartland Tech Channel.

Thanks for reading,

Anna Hensel
Heartland Tech Reporter

Featured Video

Please enjoy this video from MSNBC: “Revolution: Google and YouTube changing the world

From the Heartland Tech channel

How Illinois tech companies are working to retain local engineering grads

Courtesy Enova

GUEST: Illinois is the second largest producer of computer science graduates in the country. In fact, in 2016, Illinois produced a record 40,400 STEM degrees. Yet research collected by the Illinois Science and Technology Coalition shows Illinois still has room to grow. Specifically, while Illinois ranks 15th in the country for retaining computer science graduates, 45 percent 

Read the full story 

Esther Dyson to discuss what makes a healthy local economy at VentureBeat’s Blueprint event

VB EVENT: Way to Wellville executive founder Esther Dyson is one of the speakers at VentureBeat’s inaugural Blueprint conference, taking place on March 5-7 in Reno, Nevada. At Blueprint, speakers including Dyson will discuss how tech companies can create higher paying jobs across the U.S. and expand economic opportunity for all. A former journalist, Dyson is most well-known 

Read the full story

You don’t need to be in a major tech hub to build a cryptocurrency community

GUEST: It’s safe to say that digital currency is no longer a niche subject. Since hitting 4.9 million users in November 2016, Coinbase has nearly tripled its user base in the last year. Of course, Bitcoin’s meteoric rise is driving much of the recent interest, impacting hundreds of other digital currencies. Until now, interest in Bitcoin 

Read the full story 

Cities Amazon snubbed for HQ2 can attract other suitors by investing in local tech talent

Amazon just released the list of 20 cities that might become the host of their next office HQ2, and your city likely wasn’t on it. Yes, Amazon HQ2 is expected to bring 50,000 jobs with an average annual compensation of more than $100,000, a huge boost to any economy. But this will not be the 

Read the full story 

Beyond VB

The case for putting Amazon’s HQ2 in the suburbs

If it’s built on the urban fringe, HQ2 doesn’t have to be an inward-looking campus marooned in sprawl. It could be the mother of all suburban retrofits. (via City Lab)

Read the full story 

Memphis wasn’t ready for 4,000 new jobs, thanks to the state’s slow pace

Toyota-Mazda’s decision to locate in Alabama carries a lesson for Memphis and West Tennessee. It’s time to get ready. And it’s time for state leaders in Nashville to help Memphis get ready. (via commercial appeal)

Read the full story 

Tucked into the tax bill, a plan to help distressed America 

A little-noticed section in the $1.5 trillion tax cut that President Trump signed into law late last month is drawing attention from venture capitalists, state government officials and mayors across America. (via The New York Times)

Read the full story 

What Outcome Health must do to rebuild

Outcome Health made peace with its investors. But the company’s to-do list remains daunting: Find a CEO with the chops to take a fast-growing company to an IPO that no longer seems like a given; win back credibility with customers; rebuild morale of a staff whose confidence is shaken; restore the shine to the company’s badly tarnished reputation—and do it all under the watchful eye of two 30-something founders who still have majority ownership. (via Crain’s Chicago Business)

Read the full story 

 

Reverse Phone - People Search - Email Search - Public Records - Criminal Records. Best Data, Conversions, And Customer Suppor

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

World of Warcraft: Battle for Azeroth preorders give you a level 110 character and Allied Races

Something every woman should know - WHY MEN LIE!


Blizzard Entertainment will open orders for World of Warcraft’s next expansion, Battle for Azeroth, later today. And buying the game early gives you access to some goodies right now.

While Battle for Azeroth will launch later this year, a preorder now gives your account a free level 110 character. This is the max level before Battle for Azeroth raises it to 120. Leveling a character can take a long time, so having one start at level 110 can save you a lot of work. So, if you’re tired of the level 110 Death Knight you’ve been playing, you can now try on a level 110 Warrior without having to spend dozens of hours running him through old content.

Preordering the expansion also enables you to start recruiting the first four Allied Races. These new character options are based on existing races but have different appearances and backgrounds. They also have different racial abilities that give them advantages. The first four Allies Races — Highmountain Tauren, Lightforged Draenei, Voidwalker Elves, and Nightfallen Elves — unlock after you earn enough reputation with them in the game and complete specific quest lines.

The preorder gives players a chance to prepare for the next expansion. They’ll have time now to create a new Voidwalker Elf and get them leveled up ahead of Battle for Azeroth’s launch. This new content will also keep World of Warcraft’s players engaged (and paying for their monthly subscriptions) while they wait for the expansion.

World of Warcraft launched for PC in 2004. Battle for Azeroth is the massively mutliplayer online role-playing game’s seventh expansion. These expansion help bring a surge in WoW’s player base as lapsed fans come back to check out the new content. Blizzard has stopped reporting the number’s for WoW’s total players, though, so we don’t know exactly how many people are paying for monthly subscriptions (which cost $15 a month).

The standard digital version of Battle for Azeroth will cost $50. A deluxe edition will cost $70 and include in-game items for World of Warcraft and other Blizzard games: Hearthstone, Overwatch, StarCraft II, and Heroes of the Storm. A boxed collector’s edition is also coming, and Blizzard will details on it at a later date.

The PC Gaming channel is presented by Intel®'s Game Dev program.

Reverse Phone - People Search - Email Search - Public Records - Criminal Records. Best Data, Conversions, And Customer Suppor